Question - Request - Research - Audit Don't Speculate. Document.
RTK Media LLC
Pennsylvania Public Records & Accountability Investigations • Government Spending • Right-to-Know
▶ Watch RTK Media
Investigations | Chester County Audit

Chester Prothonotary audit flags recurring cash reconciliation problems

Chester County auditors identified unexplained cash-reconciliation differences and a gap in oversight of voided payments, while the accompanying financial audit issued a clean cash-basis opinion.

Chester Prothonotary audit flags recurring cash reconciliation problems

Chester County auditors identified unexplained cash-reconciliation differences in the Prothonotary’s 2025 records and a gap in oversight of voided payments. The findings warrant checking whether corrective work was completed, but do not establish missing money or continuing problems today. 2025 management letter, pages 1–3

The accompanying financial audit issued a clean cash-basis opinion and identified no material weakness or instances of noncompliance requiring reporting under Government Auditing Standards. Those conclusions should remain part of any assessment of the findings. 2025 financial report, pages 1 and 11–12

What the latest review found

The June 30, 2026 management letter described immaterial unresolved differences in operating and escrow reconciliations. It also identified omitted or late-recorded bank activity. Management agreed with the recommendations, but its responses supplied no implementation timetable. 2025 management letter, pages 1–2

Auditors separately found that a month-end checklist omitted review of voided checks, disbursements and internal transfers. Although CourtView retained transaction records, management had not documented independent supervisory review. Auditors recommended monthly review with evidence of completion and investigation of unusual items. Management concurred. 2025 management letter, pages 2–3

Earlier findings provide context

The preceding management letter, dated September 19, 2025, identified two account reconciliations with immaterial differences that the office could not explain or support. It described a similar prior-year finding. Management said it had arranged training and consultation and introduced consistent monthly review by the acting first deputy and acting prothonotary beginning in the first quarter of 2025. 2024 management letter, pages 1–2

That earlier review also found an erroneous escrow refund despite a court order requiring the money to remain held. Two authorized check signers did not catch the mistake. Management was pursuing resolution at that audit; the documents reviewed do not establish the amount, final disposition or whether repayment was necessary. 2024 management letter, pages 3–4

The earlier findings show why check-signing rules and supporting-document review serve different purposes. In another tested instance, a check had only one authorized signature when policy required two. In the escrow incident, two signatures were present, yet the error survived. The report recommended both enforcing signature requirements and reviewing the authority for escrow releases. 2024 management letter, pages 3–4

These records support examining the effectiveness of corrective work. They do not establish that the same transactions caused the reconciliation differences in successive years.

Why the distinction matters

The Prothonotary receives and distributes money for the county, state and other parties and holds escrow for litigants. Its financial statements cover those office accounts, not Chester County’s finances as a whole. 2025 financial report, pages 1–2 and 9–10

Chester County explains that management letters communicate procedural and control deficiencies of lesser significance, while audit reports address financial statements and significant internal-control weaknesses. Publishing both gives readers a fuller picture than relying on either document alone. Controller’s explanation of audit reporting

The timing also matters. The latest findings concern the year ended December 31, 2025. Alex Christy became prothonotary on January 5, 2026. A report addressed to him does not by itself attribute the preceding year’s transactions or decisions to him. 2025 financial report, page 10

The remaining reporting task is specific: establish when reconciliation differences were resolved, whether independent payment-review controls were implemented and tested, and how the earlier escrow error was closed. Completed review records and correction documentation could distinguish a problem that was fixed from one that still needs attention. Agreement with an auditor’s recommendation, by itself, does not answer those questions.

Don't Speculate. Document.

← Back to Investigations